Thread: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities This doesn't do any
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities This doesn't do any
From
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Hi, On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 16:25 +0000, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/foreign/dummy/Makefile?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup) > dummy_fdw.c (r1.1) > > (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/foreign/postgresql/Makefile?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup) > postgresql_fdw.c (r1.1) Err, to which (RPM) package should the dummy_fdw.so and postgresql_fdw.so go? -server, or the regular package? Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities This doesn't do any
From
Tom Lane
Date:
Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> writes: > Err, to which (RPM) package should the dummy_fdw.so and > postgresql_fdw.so go? -server, or the regular package? -server, I'd say. They're of no value without the server installed, for sure. regards, tom lane
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities This doesn't do any
From
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 18:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Err, to which (RPM) package should the dummy_fdw.so and > > postgresql_fdw.so go? -server, or the regular package? > > -server, I'd say. They're of no value without the server installed, > for sure. Thanks Tom. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org