Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?
Date
Msg-id 001001c652e2$17bd8260$65c8a8c0@lerctr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> pg_config would seem to be the appropriate place, not libpq nor
>>> psql. 
> 
>> The issue is what psql (and any libpq using program) is going to use
>> to find the UNIX socket.
> 
> No, the issue is where the server put the socket.  libpq is the wrong
> place because libpq is not the only thing people use to connect to
> the server.  
> 
> If the DBA sets a non-default unix_socket_directory via
> postgresql.conf then you're screwed no matter what: no client-side
> code can hope to tell you where it is.  The only thing that is useful
> to inspect is the server's compile-time default, and pg_config is the
> right mechanism to inspect that with.    
> 
>             regards, tom lane

The other issue is borked installs where the server and libpq disagree.
What I'm looking foris to expose what libpq has for it's default as well as what the server is
using.  There is currentlyno way to determine what libpq has for it's default.  What happened in the
irc case was a partial re-installwith non-matching server and libpq.

LER


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3683 US



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?