RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
Date
Msg-id 001201bec290$9d1300a0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to 6.5.1 status  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 11:11 AM
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
> 
> 
> We are two weeks after the 6.5 release, and the anticipated
> problems/patches/porting issues never really materialized.
> 
> I would suspect that fewer people are using PostgreSQL, but I know that
> is not true.  Seems the two months of beta really got out the bugs.
> 
> What do people want to do now?  Does anyone want to start on 6.6?  Do we
> want to release 6.5.1?  Should we relax for a few more weeks and bask in
> the stable release?
> 
> I am looking for comments.
> 

I have 2 questions for 6.5.1.

1. Currently we couldn't create an index on numeric type.   Is it difficult to add numeric_ops ? 

2. I love Oracle TRUNCATE statement.   Marcus Mascari [mascarim@yahoo.com] has already implemented   this
feature,thoughI haven't seen his implementation yet.   If his implementation is right,could this new feature be added
to   6.5.1 ?
 

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Little Suggestion for 6.6
Next
From: Michael Richards
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup Ability