Re: Scaling with memory & disk planning (was Re: Non-linear Performance) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Steve Wolfe
Subject Re: Scaling with memory & disk planning (was Re: Non-linear Performance)
Date
Msg-id 001b01c20802$8f433b60$d281f6cc@iboats.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Non-linear Performance  (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>)
Responses Re: Scaling with memory & disk planning (was Re: Non-linear
List pgsql-general
> Keeping indexes on a separate drive is also traditional database advice,
> but I don't have any feeling for how much it matters in Postgres.

  My gut feeling is that you'd be better off taking two drives and
striping them RAID 0 instead of putting data on one and indexes on
another.  Either way, you have the same potential total throughput, but if
they're in the RAID array, then you can use the total throughput more
easily, and in more situations - you don't have to depend on reading two
seperate pieces of data simultaneously to utilize the entire throughput.

steve



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joshua Drake
Date:
Subject: Actual Marketing happening
Next
From: terry@greatgulfhomes.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Scaling with memory & disk planning