RE: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Regina Obe
Subject RE: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Date
Msg-id 002701d9c4b2$bda85a10$38f90e30$@pcorp.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > On 1 Aug 2023, at 20:45, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 2:24 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
> wrote:
> >> returned with feedback.  Please feel free to resubmit to a future CF
> >> when there is a new version of the patch.
> >
> > Isn't the real problem here that there's no consensus on what to do?
>
> I don't disagree with that, but there is nothing preventing that discussion to
> continue here or on other threads.  The fact that consensus is that far away
> and no patch that applies exist seems to me to indicate that a new CF entry is
> a better option than pushing forward.
>
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson

We are still interested. We'll clean up in the next week or so.  Been tied up with PostGIS release cycle.

To Robert's point, we are losing faith in coming up with a solution that everyone agrees is workable.
What I thought Sandro had so far in his last patch seemed like a good compromise to me.
If we get it back to the point of passing the CF Bot, can we continue on this thread or are we just wasting our time?

Thanks,
Regina




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: How to build a new grammer for pg?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames