On Thursday 19 July 2001 12:00 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> > However, the utility of INSERT returning a unique identifier to the
> > inserted row needs to be addressed -- I would prefer it return the
> Another possibility, given that any app using a feature like this is
> nonportable anyway, is to extend the INSERT statement along the lines
> that someone (maybe Larry R? I forget now) proposed before:
> INSERT INTO foo ... RETURNING x,y,z,...
> where x,y,z, etc are expressions in the variables of the inserted
I like this one.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
