Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Date
Msg-id 0263bf35-05d6-02a1-519b-b7895a918314@wi3ck.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects  (Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/24/21 12:04 PM, Jan Wieck wrote:
> In any case I changed the options so that they behave the same way, the
> existing -o and -O (for old/new postmaster options) work. I don't think
> it would be wise to have option forwarding work differently between
> options for postmaster and options for pg_dump/pg_restore.

Attaching the actual diff might help.

-- 
Jan Wieck
Principle Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: default result formats setting
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods