Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Dave Page |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B885A3@mail.vale-housing.co.uk Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork?
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Bruce, Have you ever used the idocs on the PHP site? I find them invaluable, though there are many useful comments that you might not want to incorporate into the official docs for fear of bloating them. Take a look at http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.intval.php for example. Regards, Dave. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 03 February 2003 01:09 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Neil Conway; PostgreSQL Hackers > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interactive Documentation - how do you > want it towork? > > > > I don't think I was clear before. When someone is looking at > the interactive docs, I would like them to say, "Oh, there's > a comment. I better read that in case it will help me." If > we have old comments, their "special" value becomes > diminished. That's why I think they should be removed as > they are reviewed. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > > Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Neil Conway [mailto:neilc@samurai.com] > > > Sent: 02 February 2003 20:52 > > > To: Dave Page > > > Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers > > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interactive Documentation - how do you > > > want it towork? > > > > > > > 2) Bearing in mind your answer to the previous question, should > > > > all > > > > the comments be deleted when useful examples have been > > > merged into the > > > > main documents (remember that the definition of 'useful' > > > may vary), or > > > > should we only remove the 'junk' ones? > > > > > > Once the comment's suggestion has been incorporated and the > > > docs updated, I think it should be removed. Just like in the > > > rest of the documentation, there's no point presenting > > > duplicate content to the user, so we should only keep the > > > idocs comments that are still relevant. The same goes for > > > comments that have no value (e.g. support requests). > > > > My concern here is that what (for example) Bruce decides is not a > > useful addition to the docs themselves, maybe something that would > > have helped me with some bizarre problem. If we dump *all* the docs > > after they have been merged then I might lose that helpful tip. > > > > Also, and perhaps more importantly, the comments will be > merged into a > > *future* version. If I am running 7.2, I'm going to look at the 7.2 > > docs, not 7.3. > > > > Regards, Dave. > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to > majordomo@postgresql.org) > > > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, > Pennsylvania 19073 >
pgsql-hackers by date: