Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade
Date
Msg-id 06373a65-450a-40f3-b1ce-5d0373f60e8c@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade  (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
On 08.09.25 10:25, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Tasks have short names to select them and the 'Windows VS 2019' task's
> name was 'windows'  (i.e: ci-os-only: windows) but since we have two
> Windows tasks now; we need to have different names for VS 2019 and VS
> 2022 tasks. To preserve the same behavior, VS 2022 task uses 'windows'
> but VS 2019 is renamed to 'vs2019' (i.e: ci-os-only: vs2019). I am not
> completely convinced about this naming, I am open to suggestions.

I don't think we need this level of complication.  We already have the 
situation that for example "linux" covers several tasks, and "windows" 
also covers several tasks, one of which is manually triggered.  The 
"ci-os-only: vs2019" is not very useful anyway, since it's manually 
triggered.  So just applying "windows" to both of them seems ok to me.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Only one version can be installed when using extension_control_path
Next
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER DATABASE RESET with unexistent guc doesn't report an error