> On Feb 17, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>=20
> jeff@pgexperts.com writes:
>> We ran into this error on 9.4.5 this morning:
>=20
>> 2016-02-17 03:32:49.598
>> =
GMT,"procore_db","procore",22743,"10.232.0.19:59846",56c3df6e.58d7,3,"UPDA=
TE",2016-02-17
>> 02:48:14 GMT,276/1452926,4123653835,ERROR,XX001,"invalid page in =
block
>> 185809 of relation base/16477/7324724",,
>=20
> Probably not much we can do with this amount of info ... but I wonder =
if
> you identified which relation that was (table? index?)
It was actually a toast table.=
