> On Nov 7, 2025, at 00:38, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 8:38 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just eyeball reviewed v20 and got a doubt:
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
>
>> +static void
>> +discardAvailableResults(CState *st)
>> +{
>> + PGresult *res = NULL;
>> +
>> + for (;;)
>> + {
>> + res = PQgetResult(st->con);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Read and discard results until PQgetResult() returns NULL (no more
>> + * results) or a connection failure is detected. If the pipeline
>> + * status is PQ_PIPELINE_ABORTED, more results may still be available
>> + * even after PQgetResult() returns NULL, so continue reading in that
>> + * case.
>> + */
>> + if ((res == NULL && PQpipelineStatus(st->con) != PQ_PIPELINE_ABORTED) ||
>> + PQstatus(st->con) == CONNECTION_BAD)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + PQclear(res);
>> + }
>> + PQclear(res);
>> +}
>> ```
>>
>> If pipeline is aborted and no more results, then the “if” will be "true && false”. And in this case, I guess
PQstatus(st->con)!= CONNECTION_BAD because it’s not a connection error, then overall, the “if” will be “false”, and it
fallsinto an infinite loop.
>
> Can this situation actually happen? It would be helpful if you could share
> the custom script that triggers it.
No, I don’t have such a script. I am on vacation and traveling with my family this week, I just found a little time to
workon the day, that was why I only did an eyeball review.
>
> When the pipeline is aborted, PGRES_PIPELINE_SYNC should arrive afterward,
> changing the status from PQ_PIPELINE_ABORTED to PQ_PIPELINE_ON. That should
> make the condition true and prevent an infinite loop, right?
>
If you put this explanation to the inline comment, things would get clearer. But based on this explanation, I just got
theother doubt. When a pipeline is aborted, res is NULL, but we still stay in the for loop, PQClear(res) will do
nothing,then the “for” loop is similar to an empty loop, would that lead to a high CPU usage? From this perspective,
whenpipeline is aborted, while waiting for PIPELINE_SYNC, adding a tiny sleep might be better.
I will back to work next Monday, then I will try to run a test and reproduce the scenario of pipeline abort.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
