Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 1025797.1697121275@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade  (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade
Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade
Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com> writes:
> Please advise on the idea of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade, in
> a way like relfilenodes, type id and so on. What are possible downsides of
> such a solution?

You have the burden of proof backwards.  That would add a great deal
of new mechanism, and you haven't provided even one reason why it'd
be worth doing.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: odd buildfarm failure - "pg_ctl: control file appears to be corrupt"