Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mischa Sandberg
Subject Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 1115777138.42816872a29a7@webmail.telus.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>:

> Mischa Sandberg wrote:
> > Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>:
> > > Is there a TODO anywhere in this discussion?  If so, please let
> me
> > > know.
> > >
> >
> > Umm... I don't think so. I'm not clear on what TODO means yet. 'Up
> for
> > consideration'?  If a "TODO" means committing to do, I would prefer
> to
> > follow up on a remote-schema (federated server) project first.
>
> TODO means it is a change that most people think would be a good
> idea.
> It is not a committment from anyone to actually do it.

I think there has not been enough commentary from "most people".



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL