Re: new heapcheck contrib module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Date
Msg-id 114189.1603417579@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new heapcheck contrib module  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: new heapcheck contrib module
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> I get
> off = 7777, flags = 2, len = 3bbb
> on a little-endian machine, and
> off = 3bbb, flags = 2, len = 7777
> on big-endian.  It'd be less symmetric if the bytes weren't
> all the same ...

... but given that this is the test value we are using, why
don't both endiannesses whine about a non-maxalign'd offset?
The code really shouldn't even be trying to follow these
redirects, because we risk SIGBUS on picky architectures.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module