Re: more anti-postgresql FUD - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Mair
Subject Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date
Msg-id 1160633797.10542.11.camel@ultra.home.lan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more anti-postgresql FUD  (alexei.vladishev@gmail.com)
Responses Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
List pgsql-general
> Do a simple test to see my point:
>
> 1. create table test (id int4, aaa int4, primary key (id));
> 2. insert into test values (0,1);
> 3. Execute "update test set aaa=1 where id=0;" in an endless loop
>
> I just did the test on PostgreSQL 7.4.12 and MySQL 5.0.22 (MyISAM,
> sorry had no configured InnoDB). Ubuntu 6.0.6, AMD64, 2GB, default
> database settings.
>
> MySQL performs very well, approximately 15000-20000 updates per second
> with no degradation of performance.
>
> PostgreSQL does approximately 1600 records per second for the first
> 10000, then 200rps for the first 100k records, and then slower and
> slower downgrading to 10-20 rps(!!!) when reaching 300k.

Hi,
it would be cool if you could at least:

 - bundle your updates into transactions of, say, 1000 updates at a time
   i.e. wrap a BEGIN; END; around a 1000 of them
 - run postgresql with fsync off, since you're using MyISAM
 - run PostgreSQL at least 8, since you're running MySQL 5

I'd bet MySQL would still be faster on such an artificial, single user
test, but not *that much* faster.

If you don't want to install 8.0, could you maybe at least do the first
two items (shouldn't be a lot of work)...?

Which client are you using? Just mysql/psql or some API?

Bye, Chris.











pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Pundt
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with executing PostgreSQL on Embedded Linux
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: UTF-8