Re: Boolean partitions syntax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Date
Msg-id 119d5cd5-4472-4ac7-1a96-6b30d0e42f0e@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Boolean partitions syntax  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com>)
Responses Re: Boolean partitions syntax
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/7/18 11:16, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> The last line yielding:
> 
>     ERROR:  syntax error at or near "TRUE"
>     LINE 3: FOR VALUES IN (TRUE);
> 
> [Omitted from example: the “records_active” partition]
> 
> I’m glad to see this was added to the open items. I would strongly
> suggest fixing
> this prior to the 11 release as it is unintuitive from a user standpoint
> to use ‘TRUE’

I think this is actually more accurately classified as an existing bug
in PostgreSQL 10.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in create_gather_path
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Store 2PC GID in commit/abort WAL recs for logicaldecoding