On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 20:47 +0900, Jason Topaz wrote:
> I don't disagree with your point that it's not robust with examples of
> "exactly how a particular problem can be solved". But I think there are
> enough, and more importantly, I don't think problem-solving is an
> important focus for a manual (that's why 3rd party books exist).
Which is also the cause of the original rant. There is very few 3rd
party books.
