Re: pg_dump additional options for performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Date
Msg-id 1204054456.4252.420.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump additional options for performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I've not been advocating improving pg_restore, which is where the -Fc
> > tricks come in.
> > ...
> > I see you thought I meant pg_restore. I don't thinking extending
> > pg_restore in that way is of sufficiently generic use to make it
> > worthwhile. Extending psql would be worth it, since not all psql scripts
> > come from pg_dump.
> 
> OK, the reason I didn't grasp what you are proposing is that it's insane.

I love you too.

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Next
From: Robert Lor
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation