Re: What's New - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Subject | Re: What's New |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1208512505.4259.429.camel@ebony.site Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: What's New (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Responses |
Re: What's New
|
List | pgsql-www |
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 11:38 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > We need a way to link to the release notes for the latest production > > release, so people can easily see What's New. > > > > 1. Currently its very hard to locate a description of what the new > > features in the latest release are. You have to know how the docs are > > structured to find it easily. If you click on the Home Page's "Notes" > > link for 8.3.1 you go to the minor release notes for 8.3.1 and there > > is no obvious link to the notes for 8.3.0 which is where all the main > > features are described. We don't even say that's how it works, so > > there's no way of knowing you aren't viewing *all* the info. So if you > > don't know, and most people don't, 8.3 looks like a minor upgrade from > > 8.2 only, so why bother. > > Good point. But we need some way to include the release notes for the > minor version as well. Do you have any suggestion for how to do it? > Adding two different set of notes to the website there will just make > things even more confusing, I think. > Perhaps what we need is a section > in the 8.3.1 release notes that says "this is a minor update. If you > want to see the release notes between 8.2 and 8.3, please click here" > with a link to them? Good idea. Wording: "This is a minor release. For a full list of features added in this major release, please click here". Note that this would be a link between *any* minor release and its corresponding major release. i.e. 8.3.1, 8.3.2 etc would all point to 8.3 > > 2. There's no permanent URL for What's New in the latest release, so > > people that put links to us externally need to continually update > > their links. Google's What's New link points to 8.2 release notes. I > > could contact them and say "Hey Google, you're wrong" but ISTM the > > best way is for us to provide a permanent URL that we can then link > > to from Google and our own home page. Then we only need to ask them > > to do this once. > > This we can do, once we can decide what it should point to per your > first point. > > But can we actually somehow control what google chooses to link to? I > mean, if they detect our redirect and just link directly to the page it > points to, we're right back at the same point. Or if they index them as > separate pages, we'd want to make sure we get the right one. > > On the same tack, I've been trying to figure out if there is away to > make google prefer the latest version of our docs whe nyou search for > something. Now you often get hits in 7.4.. Like a way to prioritize it. > Anybody know if there is a way to do that? I think: talk to Google. But no point until we have our house in order. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com