On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 17:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 13:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It might be possible to treat "ignore the RHS" as a join strategy and
> >> try to apply it while forming join relations, which would be late enough
> >> to have all the needed info available.
>
> > Oh, actually have a join node that is a no-op, with a path cost of zero?
>
> Not even that: just return the best path(s) for the LHS as the paths for
> the joinrel.
Much neater. Cool.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
