On 10/14/21 5:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Yes, that's been puzzling me too. I've just been staring at it again and
>> nothing jumps out. But maybe we can investigate that offline if this
>> test is deemed not worth keeping.
> As Mark says, it'd be interesting to know whether the use of
> background_psql is related, because if it is, we'd want to debug that.
> (I don't really see how it could be related, but maybe I just lack
> sufficient imagination today.)
Yeah. I'm working on getting a cut-down reproducible failure case.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
