Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
Date
Msg-id 12524.1246648767@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Consistency here is pointless.  IIRC the dual method is used in contrib
> because people did not trust the PGXS stuff enough to rip the original
> Make code out; or maybe because people did not want PGXS to become the
> default build method, but they allowed it to be used in contrib as a
> test bed that PGXS worked.

The main reason contrib still has the alternate method is that PGXS
doesn't really work until after you've installed the core build.
For modules distributed separately from core, it doesn't seem that
exciting to be able to build using the contrib method.

Now, having said that, I'm personally interested in being able to build
pg_migrator against an uninstalled source tree, because I foresee
needing to do that for RPM packaging purposes.  But I could easily patch
the makefiles if needed to make that happen.  I don't think this case
should drive the choice of what's the default or common method.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: First CommitFest: July 15th
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXS problem with pdftotext