Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)
Date
Msg-id 1254591457.19413.12.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 12:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I am inclined to think that we should add another expected-file
> showing the single-byte \200 result.  What that might get displayed
> as on the local system isn't really our concern.

OK, the reason I couldn't reproduce this for the life of me is that I
had PGCLIENTENCODING=UTF8 in the environment of the server(!).  Once I
unset that, I could reproduce the problem.  This could be made a bit
more well-defined if we ran pg_regress with --multibyte=something,
although that is then liable to fail in encodings that don't have an
equivalent of \u0080.  Some with your suggestion above: It will only
work for some encodings.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)