Re: Proposal - temporal contrib module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Proposal - temporal contrib module
Date
Msg-id 1256840748.10769.138.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal - temporal contrib module  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:37 +0000, Richard Huxton wrote:
> There are cases where one time is genuinely unknown, and there we need
> a null.

The semantics of a period with one side NULL require a more clear
definition. I don't personally see a lot of utility in trying to support
NULL semantics, but if we want to support it, it needs to be clearly
defined.

Does TSQL-2 offer any guidance here?

> That's assuming we've got a guarantee
> that from<=to for all periods.

Of course. Except that means that a NULL on one side of a period is a
little less unknown than other kinds of NULLs ;)

Regards,Jeff Davis



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal - temporal contrib module
Next
From: Scott Bailey
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal - temporal contrib module