Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no> writes:
> What I don't get is why everybody think that because one solution doesn't fit
> all needs on all platforms(or NFS), it shouldn't be implemented on those
> platforms it *does* work on.
(1) Because we're not really interested in supporting multiple fundamentally
different approaches to postmaster interlocking. The system is
complicated enough already.
(2) Because according to discussion so far, we can't rely on this "solution"
anywhere. Postgres can't easily tell whether its data directory is
mounted over NFS, for example.
regards, tom lane
