Re: plpython3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: plpython3
Date
Msg-id 1265060352.10100.189.camel@jd-desktop.iso-8859-1.charter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpython3  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:31 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>  
> > > I would love to know why PL/Python can't be incrementally improved like
> > > the rest of our code.
> > 
> > It has been. That is exactly what PeterE has been doing.
> > 
> > However, if you look at this whole thread, you will see the James has a
> > very different view of the implementation. One that at least appears to
> > be more advanced and "pythonic" than our version.
> 
> More "pythonic" in its internal processing or in its user interface?

User interface and also internal processing (see the types discussion).

Joshua D. Drake




-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR - Bug or feature?
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Write a WAL record whenever we perform an operation without