Re: review: xml_is_well_formed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
Date
Msg-id 1281127956.2563.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: review: xml_is_well_formed  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
List pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2010-08-06 at 07:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > What about making the function sensitive to the XML OPTION, such
> that:
> >
> > test=# SET xmloption TO DOCUMENT;
> > SET
> > text=# SELECT xml_is_well_formed('foo');
> >
> >  xml_is_well_formed
> >  --------------------
> >  f
> >  (1 row)
> 
> That will make using this function a huge hassle, won't it?  Functions
> that do different things depending on GUC settings are usually
> troublesome.  Having three functions would be more sensible if we need
> all three behaviors, but I don't see why we do.

Upthread you opined that this function should essentially indicate
whether a cast to type xml would succeed, and observing the xmloption is
an essential part of that.  I had assumed the original patch actually
did that.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: review: xml_is_well_formed