Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC
Date
Msg-id 12822.1150429186@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> The <quote>magic block</> present in all PostgreSQL-supported libraries
>>> is checked to guarantee compatibility.  For this reason, non-PostgreSQL
>>> libraries cannot be loaded in this way.
>> 
>> you need "must be" before "present".  

> Uh, the point is not that they need a magic block (though they do), but
> rather that the magic block is always checked.

It's a grammar complaint, not a factual complaint.  Personally I'd
suggest wording it as "the magic block required in all ..."
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql and process titles
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement