Re: .gitignore files, take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: .gitignore files, take two
Date
Msg-id 1285079885.5468.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to .gitignore files, take two  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: .gitignore files, take two
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-09-21 at 00:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 3. What are the ignore filesets *for*, in particular should they list
> just the derived files expected in a distribution tarball, or all the
> files in the set of build products in a normal build?

My personal vote: Forget the whole thing.

I have never found the .cvsignore files useful for anything, but they
have only been a small annoyance when someone else quietly updated them
when I supposedly forget.  Some of the new proposed schemes
for .gitignore appear to be significantly more involved.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: .gitignore files, take two
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: .gitignore files, take two