Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- is Final - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Subject Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- is Final
Date
Msg-id 128b6988-bb29-bb24-453f-421c5c5b7c7d@kaltenbrunner.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- is Final  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- is Final
List pgsql-advocacy
On 09/13/2016 08:39 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 09/13/2016 11:22 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 13 September 2016 at 12:55, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Given the lack of additional feedback, we're going to call the current
>>> press release final.  Translation copies to be prepared by Thursday.
>>
>> What is the thing we are calling final?
>>
>> This looks still in progress... not just in name
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/96releasedraft
>
> If you have additional feedback/improvements on the release text, please
> give them ASAP.

some comments:


1. I changed all the urls to https because that is what we have for a
while now...

2. the wiki page still has this:

"QUOTE ABOUT SCALING OUT ON POSTGRES HERE "

is this going to be filled?

3. "Phrase search means that PostgreSQL continues to be an alternative
to dedicated text search technologies for web search and data mining"
sound rather boring and not very nice to me - it basically reads as
"yeah we can kinda do what others can do better"


4. is it Btree or B-tree (we seem to use the later in the docs - and
yeah I do see it is a quote)?

5. 32X -> 32x?


In general the press release seems to be fairly rough to me and a bit of
a strange mix between technical details/wording like "remote apply" and
general marketing speak like "scale up and scale out"



Stefan


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- is Final
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- is Final