Re: why two dashes in extension load files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: why two dashes in extension load files
Date
Msg-id 1297951377.31633.6.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why two dashes in extension load files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-02-15 at 15:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I can't claim close familiarity with Debian's conventions in this
> matter, but I do know about RPM's, and I'm uneager to duplicate that
> silliness.  Magic conversion of dots to underscores (sometimes),
> complete inability to determine which part of the package filename is
> which without external knowledge, etc.

FYI, the system in Debian is that '_' separate package name and version,
and '_' is not allowed in package name or version.  I guess since we
want to allow both '_' and '-' in package names, we can't really do that
or anything similar.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix blatantly uninitialized variable in recent commit.