Re: template0 database comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: template0 database comment
Date
Msg-id 1299960621.21000.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: template0 database comment  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: template0 database comment
List pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2011-03-12 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shouldn't the "postgres" database get a comment too, while we're at
> it?  Perhaps "default database to connect to"?

That's not actually true, though.  Maybe it's the "default database used
by administration programs"?  In practice it might be "some otherwise
unused database that's occasionally useful". ;-)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Collations versus user-defined functions
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Collations versus user-defined functions