On 8/6/25 1:17 PM, Rumpi Gravenstein wrote:
> Just coming back to this. Don't know how to interpret this:
>
> xxx_pub_dev_2_db=# select proname, pronamespace, oid from pg_proc where
> proname like '%sa_setup%';
> proname | pronamespace | oid
> ----------------+--------------+---------
> _sa_setup_role | 7038406 | 7869125
> (1 row)
>
> xxx_pub_dev_2_db=# drop FUNCTION if exists _sa_setup_role;
> DROP FUNCTION
> xxx_pub_dev_2_db=# select proname, pronamespace, oid from pg_proc where
> proname like '%sa_setup%';
> proname | pronamespace | oid
> ---------+--------------+-----
> (0 rows)
>
> xxx_pub_dev_2_db=# select _sa_setup_role('af_repo_app');
> ERROR: malformed array literal: "af_repo_app"
> LINE 1: select _sa_setup_role('af_repo_app');
Do you have a custom type named sa_setup_role?
In psql do:
\dT
or
select * from pg_type where typname = 'sa_setup_role';
> ^
> DETAIL: Array value must start with "{" or dimension information.
> xxx_pub_dev_2_db=#
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:52 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
> <mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote:
>
> Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at
> <mailto:laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>> writes:
> > On Fri, 2025-07-25 at 14:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So ... any chance you have a data type named _sa_setup_role?
>
> > ... it could also be a type "sa_setup_role", and "_sa_setup_role"
> > is interpreted as the corresponding array type:
>
> Oh, of course --- that's a good deal more likely than my version.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
> --
> Rumpi Gravenstein
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com