Re: [RFC] Common object property boards - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
Date
Msg-id 1312820469-sup-9000@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Common object property boards  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun ago 08 12:05:05 -0400 2011:

> We could do that, but what the heck is the point?   What benefit are
> we trying to get by not returning a pointer to the structure?  I feel
> like we're making this ludicrously complicated with no real
> justification of why all of this complexity is adding any value.

I don't see that it's complicated in any way.  Seems pretty simple to me.
The justification is simple too: don't export struct definitions without
need.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: psql document fix about showing FDW options
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Compiler warnings with stringRelOpts (was WIP: Fast GiST index build)