Re: Suggestions for improving \conninfo output in v18 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Suggestions for improving \conninfo output in v18
Date
Msg-id 1314564.1749789172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggestions for improving \conninfo output in v18  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:05 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
> wrote:
>> Therefore I see this as fixing an oversight in commit bba2fbc6238, so I'd
>> like to commit the 0001 patch as well in v18. Thought?

> You should get the concurrence of the RMT.
> ...
> Also, I was under the impression that updating relevant documentation for
> a feature wasn't even subject to RMT review;

FWIW, I agree with David's view of both of these points.  RMT
review of 0001 should be a formality here, but nonetheless
we should adhere to process.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestions for improving \conninfo output in v18
Next
From: Sungwoo Chang
Date:
Subject: Fwd: dsm_registry: Add detach and destroy features