On fre, 2012-02-24 at 14:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> (Thinks some more...) Actually, the point of SECURITY DEFINER on a
> trigger function is to run as somebody other than the table owner,
> to wit the function owner. And with an anonymous function there
> couldn't be any other owner. So I guess there is no need for this
> clause in this context.
You're right. The whole clause will be useless in this case.
