Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up
Date
Msg-id 14333.1556999705@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 1:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yeah, I didn't really think it was worth distinguishing.  If there
>> is some more general term that covers both calls, maybe we should
>> use that?

> I would just do s/fsync/fsync and sync_file_range/.  And I guess also
> wrap them in <function>?

OK, will do it like that.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Commits 8de72b and 5457a1 (COPY FREEZE)