Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
Date
Msg-id 14871.1506187736@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> I have spent some time looking at your patch and testing it. This
> looks sane. A small comment that I have would be to add an assertion
> at the top of perform_work_item to be sure that it is called in the
> memory context of AutovacMemCxt.

Done like that, thanks for reviewing!
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling