Re: LLVM / clang - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LLVM / clang
Date
Msg-id 15062.1276177969@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LLVM / clang  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: LLVM / clang
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage
> on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better integration
> with glibc might be needed.  Building with llvm-gcc works fine, but I
> understand that using llvm-gcc with native code generation isn't all
> that different from using gcc itself, so that's not a surprising result.
> The only issue is that the float8 regression test fails, so it is
> apparently not *exactly* the same.

There's a buildfarm animal using llvm-gcc, and it passes just fine ...
so the float8 failure sounds to me like another integration problem.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] No hash join across partitioned tables?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: warning message in standby