Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind
Date
Msg-id 1599628.1764173431@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind
List pgsql-hackers
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> It looks like the failures are limited to AArch64, and commit f8f4afe did
> change the code in question a bit.  However, there are failures on older
> PG versions where that commit was not applied, so the evidence does seem to
> point to a compiler bug.

The present failures started much more recently than f8f4afe ...
leafhopper, for example, was okay until about a day ago.
Also, AFAICS f8f4afe was HEAD-only, but leafhopper is also
failing in v18.  (No evidence as yet about older branches.)

Anyway, this is exactly the sort of analysis that we shouldn't
be doing.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixes bug in strlower_libc_sb()