Re: [GENERAL] DECLARE CURSOR - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [GENERAL] DECLARE CURSOR |
Date | |
Msg-id | 16145.1037579431@sss.pgh.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [GENERAL] DECLARE CURSOR (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: [GENERAL] DECLARE CURSOR
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Let's just fix it and roll an RC2 with the fix. If not, we can just fix > it in 7.3.1 but I see little problem in rolling an RC2. Here is the patch I am testing (in current sources; I don't think it needs any adjustments for REL7_3, but haven't tried to apply it yet). Basically it moves the test that was originally done in parse/analyze.c into the execution-time setup of a cursor, and enlarges the test to understand about autocommit-off and inside-a-function exceptions. Anyone see a problem? regards, tom lane *** src/backend/access/transam/xact.c.orig Wed Nov 13 10:51:46 2002 --- src/backend/access/transam/xact.c Sun Nov 17 19:10:20 2002 *************** *** 1488,1493 **** --- 1488,1537 ---- } } + /* -------------------------------- + * RequireTransactionChain + * + * This routine is to be called by statements that must run inside + * a transaction block, because they have no effects that persist past + * transaction end (and so calling them outside a transaction block + * is presumably an error). DECLARE CURSOR is an example. + * + * If we appear to be running inside a user-defined function, we do not + * issue an error, since the function could issue more commands that make + * use of the current statement's results. Thus this is an inverse for + * PreventTransactionChain. + * + * stmtNode: pointer to parameter block for statement; this is used in + * a very klugy way to determine whether we are inside a function. + * stmtType: statement type name for error messages. + * -------------------------------- + */ + void + RequireTransactionChain(void *stmtNode, const char *stmtType) + { + /* + * xact block already started? + */ + if (IsTransactionBlock()) + return; + /* + * Are we inside a function call? If the statement's parameter block + * was allocated in QueryContext, assume it is an interactive command. + * Otherwise assume it is coming from a function. + */ + if (!MemoryContextContains(QueryContext, stmtNode)) + return; + /* + * If we are in autocommit-off mode then it's okay, because this + * statement will itself start a transaction block. + */ + if (!autocommit && !suppressChain) + return; + /* translator: %s represents an SQL statement name */ + elog(ERROR, "%s may only be used in begin/end transaction blocks", + stmtType); + } + /* ---------------------------------------------------------------- * transaction block support *** /home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c.orig Wed Sep 4 17:30:43 2002 --- /home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c Sun Nov 17 19:10:26 2002 *************** *** 161,166 **** --- 161,168 ---- /* If binary portal, switch to alternate output format */ if (dest == Remote &&parsetree->isBinary) dest = RemoteInternal; + /* Check for invalid context (must be in transaction block) */ + RequireTransactionChain((void *) parsetree, "DECLARE CURSOR"); } else if (parsetree->into !=NULL) { *** /home/postgres/pgsql/src/include/access/xact.h.orig Wed Nov 13 10:52:07 2002 --- /home/postgres/pgsql/src/include/access/xact.h Sun Nov 17 19:10:13 2002 *************** *** 115,120 **** --- 115,121 ---- extern void UserAbortTransactionBlock(void); extern void AbortOutOfAnyTransaction(void); extern void PreventTransactionChain(void*stmtNode, const char *stmtType); + extern void RequireTransactionChain(void *stmtNode, const char *stmtType); extern void RecordTransactionCommit(void);
pgsql-hackers by date: