Re: Review: listagg aggregate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Date
Msg-id 162867791001252314t19badd31yee443e2bd38cd61@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: listagg aggregate  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Re: Review: listagg aggregate
List pgsql-hackers
2010/1/25 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:27 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:09 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> xmlagg -> concatenates values to form xml datum
>>> array_agg -> concatenates values to form array datum
>>> ??? -> concatenates values to form string datum
>>
>> concat_agg().
>
> I like that one...
>

why is concat_agg better than listagg ?

Pavel

> ...Robert
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with CVS on pgfoundry
Next
From: Takahiro Itagaki
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax supplements for SET options