Re: GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays
Date
Msg-id 16433.1234472056@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays  (Rusty Conover <rconover@infogears.com>)
Responses Re: GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays
List pgsql-performance
Rusty Conover <rconover@infogears.com> writes:
> Since 100% of my queries are for retrieval, I should use GIN but it
> never appears to be used unlike how GIST indexes are:

You haven't shown us either the table or the index declaration,
so it's a bit tough to comment on that.  It's worth noting though
that your GIST example appears to rely on a nonstandard operator class.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Rusty Conover
Date:
Subject: GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays
Next
From: Rusty Conover
Date:
Subject: Re: GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays