Re:Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From yangtao
Subject Re:Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0
Date
Msg-id 164acded.2d24.176cc215672.Coremail.yangtaoyours@126.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
em~~~,  I read the release notes [1] right now.
I try my best fix it as you suggested, and persuade my partners to not use version 9.6.0. 
Thanks for your help!

Best Regards!
Tao






At 2021-01-04 14:36:30, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >yangtao <yangtaoyours@126.com> writes: >> Yes, I compile it by configure --with-system-tzdata, should I remove it? >> What's more, because some other components dependency, I must use version 9.6.0. > >No. For god's sake, fix whatever components you are using that think >they must have 9.6.0 rather than 9.6.later. Read the release notes [1]. >Insisting on 9.6.0 four years later is professional malpractice. > >(I'll not even get into the question of whether you should be installing >some later release branch than 9.6.x; but I can't help noting that 9.6's >EOL is 11 months away.) > > regards, tom lane > >[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/


 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0
Next
From: Thiemo Kellner
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible trigger bug? function call argument literalised