Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
Date
Msg-id 1666832.1622067703@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Looks good to me.
> I tested the behavior with partitioned tables and it seems OK.

Thanks for reviewing/testing!

> It would be good to have a test case in src/bin/pg_dump/t/002_pg_dump.pl
> for the case

Personally I won't touch 002_pg_dump.pl with a 10-foot pole, but if
somebody else wants to, have at it.

> ... and I find it odd that we don't seem to have anything
> for the "CREATE TABLE foo (LIKE sometab INCLUDING stuff)" form of the
> command ... but neither of those seem the fault of this patch, and they
> both work as [I think] is intended.

Hm, there's this in compression.sql:

-- test LIKE INCLUDING COMPRESSION
CREATE TABLE cmdata2 (LIKE cmdata1 INCLUDING COMPRESSION);
\d+ cmdata2

Or did you mean the case with a partitioned table specifically?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: storing an explicit nonce