Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD
Date
Msg-id 16905.1551225329@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I think it would be better to just put back the .defn = "" (etc) to the
> ArchiveEntry calls.

Yeah, that was what I was imagining --- just make the ArchiveEntry calls
act exactly like they did before in terms of what gets filled into the
TOC fields.  This episode is a fine reminder of why premature optimization
is the root of all evil...

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays
Next
From: Paul Ramsey
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info