Re: [HACKERS] 'Waiting on lock' - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 'Waiting on lock'
Date
Msg-id 17820.1190726213@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 'Waiting on lock'  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 'Waiting on lock'
List pgsql-patches
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> SQLServer and DB2 have more need of this than PostgreSQL, but we do
> still need it.

Why?  What does it do that statement_timeout doesn't do better?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: Thread-safe PREPARE in ecpg
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 'Waiting on lock'