Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API
Date
Msg-id 17932.1543173376@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Committed with that addition.

Some of the buildfarm doesn't like this.  I realized that the common
denominator was EXEC_BACKEND: if you build with -DEXEC_BACKEND the
failure is completely reproducible.  Presumably something is thinking
that it will inherit some variable from the postmaster via fork.
I don't know if that's a new bug or was just exposed by a new test.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups