Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 18144.1307472949@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> Before you arrived, it was quite normal to suggest tuning patches
> after feature freeze.

*Low risk* tuning patches make sense at this stage, yes.  Fooling with
the lock mechanisms doesn't qualify as low risk in my book.  The
probability of undetected subtle problems is just too great.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks