Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage |
Date | |
Msg-id | 18196.1200461119@sss.pgh.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage
Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage |
List | pgsql-www |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > Did I miss something? I haven't seen anything. You didn't get a dozen or three variants of the below? It seems to have subsided now, but I was getting them at the rate of maybe one a minute for some time there. All forged in the name of real PG subscribers, which no doubt is how they got through the filters. I imagine the list moderators will be looking at some unpleasantly long queues of stuff that didn't get through the filters... regards, tom lane Return-Path: pgsql-general-owner+m126954=tgl=sss.pgh.pa.us@postgresql.org Delivery-Date: Tue Jan 15 23:18:44 2008 Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0G4Ihis017580for<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:18:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DA42E2D3Afor <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>;Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:18:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)withESMTP id 94174-01-9 for <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>;Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:18:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C452E4352for <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>;Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:04:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE30D2E318Afor <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:53:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)withESMTP id 14192-09 for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:53:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6962E2FA7for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:53:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72])by news.hub.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0G3rna1017353for<pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:53:50 -0400 (AST)(envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost)by news.hub.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m0G3TMim002237for pgsql-general@postgresql.org;Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:29:22 -0400 (AST)(envelope-from news) From: Hannes Dorbath <light@theendofthetunnel.de> X-Newsgroups: sci.engr.joining.welding,pgsql.general Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Segmentation fault with 8.3 FTS ISpell Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:52:25 GMT Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services Lines: 27 Message-ID: <eodwe0$5e8p$5@news.hub.org> References: <fmi409$7t2$1@news.hub.org> <20080115121647.GB4473@alvh.no-ip.org> <478CB412.3060408@theendofthetunnel.de> X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@interware.hu To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general> List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help> List-ID: <pgsql-general.postgresql.org> List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org> List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-general> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-general> Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org with the imagination that it is, therefore, obscure and, on the contrary, that what is to prove it is clear, and so we understand it easily. 41. Epigrams of Martial.--Man loves malice, but not against one-eyed men nor the unfortunate, but against the fortunate and proud. People are mistaken in thinking otherwise. For lust is the source of all our actions, and humanity, etc. We must please those who have humane and tender feelings. That epigram about two one-eyed people is worthless, for it does not console them and only gives a point to the author's glory. All that is only for the sake of the author is worthless. Ambitiosa recident ornamenta.[4] 42. To call a king "Prince" is pleasing, because it diminishes his rank. 43. Certain authors, speaking of their works, say: "My book," "My commentary," "My history," etc. They resemble middle-class people who have a house of their own and always have "My house" on their tongue. They would do better to say: "Our book," "Our commentary," "Our history," etc., because there is in them usually more of other people's than their own. 44. Do you wish people to believe good of you? Don't speak. 45. Languages are ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq